|
FIBERS
AND WWR
(Revised April
12, 2002)
We
get questioned all the time...
Should
I use fibers instead of Welded Wire Reinforcement?
First of all, Welded Wire Reinforcement
(WWR) for reinforced concrete has performed well for as long as historical
records tell us its been out there. The first patent rights for the product
were issued in 1901 in the U.S. First, there was triangular wire reinforcing
(before there were welders) up to 1911, and then WWR when welders were
invented. There are over 100 years of WWR performance on record - interesting,
and it is still being produced in greater quantities than ever before.
But more on that later. We have no reports on poor performance of steel
reinforcement; on the contrary, we get many reports where people were
convinced to leave the steel reinforcement out and substitute some type
and some quantity of fiber in the mix, and then unhappy they did not have
steel reinforced concrete. We'll leave the failure modes to your research
and investigations. Needless to say, the reports state that the fibers
did not do what they were promised they would do....????
Fibers
are not concrete reinforcement.
Welded Wire Reinforcement (WWR) is concrete reinforcement.
Watch what the fiber people say about fibers - they say
it protects concrete from early plastic shrinkage cracking, they say it
increases impact resistance of the surface, and they say it improves the
durability of the concrete. They may call it fibrous or fiber-reinforced
concrete - BUT do not get it confused with concrete reinforcement in the
form of welded wire reinforcement (WWR).
Here
is what the WWR does in concrete.
First of all, steel reinforcement is primary, not secondary,
and engineers know it. There are no secondary stresses in structures.
Steel reinforcement is a structural element in concrete that handles stresses
due to shrinkage, and we might add, tensile strength for expansion in
the case of shrinkage compensating concrete. It also restrains the concrete
to help prevent wide and displaced cracking. See reference: WRI's TF 705,
"Innovative Ways to Reinforce Slabs on Ground", by Bob Anderson, consultant.
Where
and how should I place WWR?
We
hear that some contractors have placed it on the ground and they are satisfied
with the performance and will not change their methods. More power to
them. WRI prefers, and has said for a long time, that WWR needs to be
supported like rebars. Many contractors know where steel reinforcement
needs to be placed and their project superintendents oversee labor forces
to insure the proper placement. Engineers must specify where the reinforcing
should be placed and type/s of supports to be used. Engineers should discuss
problems and corrections with the contractors as the job progresses. When
discussions include the placement of welded wire reinforcement, it needs
to be emphasized that welded wire is supported just like supported rebars.
Welded wire with wide spacings and larger wire sizes has been used successfully
for years to support construction loads without displacing it. See reference
guide, WRI's TF 702-R2, "Supporting WWR". This document will answer questions
about types of supports, methods to keep the WWR positioned, and how far
to space the supports.
If the steel reinforcing is placed close to the bottom (assuming single
layer applications), the cracks would be wider at the topbut
the steel reinforcing will still work to control cracking and crack widths
much better than plain or fibrous concrete slabs. That is why we either
suggest another layer or a single layer of reinforcement be positioned
within 1/3 the thickness of the slab from the top, or a minimum of 2"
- that is to protect from wide or displaced cracking and curling if it
does occur - a kind of insurance policy. When the steel reinforcing is
properly positioned there is a history of quality projects that prove
there is better crack width control and little to no displacement compared
to slabs without steel reinforcement. Another item to note- There is no
ACI Code or guide that says that steel reinforcement can be substituted
with fibers. In fact, ACI 302-1R-96 (latest) Guide for Concrete Floor
and Slab Construction, Section 5.8.3, does reflect on the subject. It
states "fibers should not be used to replace temperature and shrinkage
reinforcement because they have little impact on the behavior of concrete
after it hardens".
How
is the fiber market affecting WWR?
There
has been great growth in specifying and the purchase of WWR. Tonnage figures
show that the light building styles are continuing to increase - up 6%
over 1980 numbers and structural tonnage numbers are 300% over 1980 totals.
Rather than compare WWR with fibers, we prefer to compare WWR with the
rebar market. There is approximately a 5 million ton per year market for
#3, #4, #5, & #6 rebar sizes (the metric call-outs are #10, #13, #16
& #19). WWR styles of reinforcement can be compared with those rebar
sizes and spacings. Even some larger areas of rebars can be compared with
WWR styles, if the engineers will allow increased strengths of WWR and/
or reduced spacings.
WRI
wishes to thank the owners, contractors, and engineers that have had the
confidence and are satisfied with WWR performance to not just continue
to specify and place WWR, but have doubled the WWR concrete reinforcement
market in recent years.
Summary
It
would be interesting to see how many people have realized that fibers
and steel reinforcement do different things in concrete and have specified
and placed both materials in their projects. With all the talk of high-performance
concrete and improved quality of concrete construction, one wonders if
people are considering supplements and not alternatives for welded wire
reinforcement.
Conclusion
A
final question can be pondered? What crack width and how much displacement
or curling, and what maintenance costs would occur if WWR steel reinforcing
were not present!!
NOTE:
The Tech Facts (TF's) referenced
above may be downloaded from the
WRI Publications page on this web site. Two additional articles,
written by Roy H. Reiterman, may be viewed/downloaded (PDF
Files: if you do not have Acrobat
Reader Click here to download it.)
by clicking the links below.
"Why
Steel Reinforcement is Needed in Concrete Slabs",
by Roy H. Reiterman, WRI, published in Concrete International,
December, 1996
"Concrete
Cracking", by Roy H. Reiterman, WRI,
published in the WRI UPDATE newsletter, January, 2000
Back
to WRI
News
|
|
|
WRI,
942 Main Street, Suite 300, Hartford, CT 06103 PH (800) 552-4WRI
[4974] FAX (860) 808-3009
Outside the United States, call 1-860-808-3000 x356
©2003 Wire Reinforcement Institute
|
|